scribbles posted in July, 2006

loser

Wednesday, July 5th, 2006 | tags: , , ,  |

This passport is a replacement for a passport ‘Declared LOST’, urgh.   I anticipate delays and humiliation at US immigration.     My new 10yr UK passport ID page has this special warning printed on the back:

LOST passport replacement

Pretty illustrations of different birds on each page and dual language (English and French)  almost make up for the likely extra detailed questioning when trying to get back into the US.   Sigh.

what do you think of that »

kitten heeled mules

Tuesday, July 4th, 2006 | tags: ,  |

I bought a cute pair of black mules with padded insteps,   kitten heels, and big  circular tortoise-shell-style plastic buckles reminiscent of Jackie kennedy’s style.   These little beauties  will replace my lovable well-worn cushion soled sensible outdoor wear Rockport black mules.   My  Rockport mules would look  at home with a pair  of khaki cargo pants.   They are getting grody. They had to go.   My new mules will go well with hipster jeans and pretty dresses.

new mules and old mules basking in the afternoon sunlight of my stairwell

Warning:   high risk of public displays of girliness (PDG)

2 bits of fabulous banter »

device drivers to distraction

Monday, July 3rd, 2006 | tags: , ,  |

(extremely boring entry warning)

today I had to scan a copy of my new passport information for the US  immigration people.   I haven’t used my scanner since Tinkerbell bit the dust.   Somewhere in the universe there is a CD that I should use to make my Canon scanner work with Darling.   Do I know where it is?   Um,   no,   Do I want to rummage through piles of user manuals and CD’s in some dark disorganised cupboard, err, no thanks.   I probably threw the CD away when recycling the original packaging,   I like to live ‘light’.   Below is a description of my punishment for trying to live light……  

  1. plug scanner into one of Darling‘s ample USB ports.   Little balloony-thing says new device detected and pops a wizardy thing asking me to either  
    • insert my CD  
    • search for the drivers on the internet  
    • browse  to a folder that contains the drivers.  
  2. Search the internet.   Drivers not found.   Bollocks.
  3. Try a different USB port.   Drivers not found.   Bollocks.
  4. Find driver downloads on Cannon’s web page,   find the name of my scanner (on the scanner) and download the driver.   Didn’t read the instructions.  Just clicked ‘download’ and ‘run’.   That should work.
  5. Unplug and replug the scanner.   Select manually point to a folder that contains the driver.   Darn,   I didn’t check where the download put it.   I’ll point to the windows folder,   its probably put there and its the default place being pointed to by the search anyway. Drivers not found.   Bollocks.
  6. Try a different USB port.   Drivers not found.   Bollocks.
  7. Go back to the Cannon download site and read the instructions.   I should have clicked on some “set-up.exe” once I’d done the download.   Bollocks.   Since I have no idea where the download went,   I download the drivers again and save them to my network drive with a sensible name rather than meaningless name  that Canon has used.   Aha,   progress!   I run the set-up.exe.  
  8. Unplug and replug the scanner.   Select manually point to a folder that contains the driver.   Try to select the folder on my network drive.   But,   when I point at this folder the dialog wont let me select ‘OK’,   it only lets me point to the Windows folder.   Bollocks.
  9. Copy the downloaded folder into the windows folder,   run the set-up.exe again (just incase). Unplug and replug the scanner point to the folder containing the drivers.   Drivers not found Bollocksy-Bollocks.
  10. Make cup of tea.   Breath slowly and deeply.
  11. Open the device manager.   It shows my Scanner with a yellow exclamation mark over it – no drivers.   Right-click on this and select ‘update drivers’ get the same wizardy thing I’ve already tried 700x.   Point to the folder where I’ve downloaded the files.   Drivers not found Bollocksy-Bollocks  with brass-knobs on.  
  12. Start pulling at my hair and take the swearing up a notch to ‘unpublishable’.
  13. Open the folder that I downloaded from Cannon,   notice there’s a second .exe in there that I haven’t yet clicked on.   Click on it.
  14. Unplug and replug the scanner.   The yellow balloony-thing  this time includes the name of the scanner.   Hooray.    A dialogue pop’s up asking me what I want windows to do everytime I plug in this device,   it includes an option for running the ‘scanner wizard’,   thankyou,   I’ll take that please.   Then I successfully scan my passport for the US immigration people.   Phew.

Rumour has it that Windows Vista will be hot on ‘plug and play’.   No more keeping old CD’s from device manufacturers with the device,   no more searching for and installing (or failing to) drivers from the device manufacturers website.   I hope.   Vista might just let me plug in my scanner and scan.   In the future normal people might not have to know about drivers to use their computers.

How sexy is that?     ooooooOOOOOoooo     :-)

2 bits of fabulous banter »

too hot

Monday, July 3rd, 2006 | tags:  |

English (51.30 °N) summers are normally cooler than Seattle (47 °37′N).   This summer southern England is experiencing a heatwave.    The BBC reports 90  degrees today.   While the gentle glow of sweat on skin can be very sensuous, moving is yet more sensuous.   Today I’ve been lurking in the shade and  seeking cool breezes.   I even checked out the cost of purchasing and ‘air conditioner’.   Air conditioners are a new technology for me, not commonly available in the UK,   no need.   I prefer the action possibilities afforded by living in higher lattitudes than 47 °37′N.    More outdoors ‘stuff’ is possible all year round.

what do you think of that »

commenting on US commentators

Sunday, July 2nd, 2006 | tags: ,  |

US commenter’s fictional statement on a football match:  

previously  an umotivated  not pretty deadleg would streak into the box  and step on an airborne bench, that’s a no-no, giving the opposition a P.K.   History is against the bench”  

The below commentary on American Broadcasting Company (ABC, US) Portugal vs England World Cup match commentator’s comments will help you translate the above fictional  sentence.

go airborne. Another new euphamism!   ‘we’ve seen a lot of players go airborne in these 21 minutes with some nasty landings’   go airborne = jump?  

streaking. “Here’s Rooney streaking up the right side”   In the context of soccer the word streaking is normally reserved for the nude people who dash across the pitch.  

playing benches. The benches might come into play”   Can you picture it.   Benches playing football.   He must mean the players sat on the benches.   The substitutes.   Why not say substitutes?

not pretty. English soccer is not pretty but its effective”   Bollocks.   Joe Cole’s footwork is as cute as a freshly baked cherry pie.    That’s so cute it’s pretty.   England’s playing may  be sloppy at times, for international level play.    These commentators crossed my offense-line when they called the English team’s playing ‘not pretty’ = UGLY.   I suspect US sensitivities make it more polite to say ‘not pretty’ than ‘ugly’.  

Dead legs. There are a lot of dead-legs in that box”   ‘The box’ refers to a marked area on the pitch immediately surrounding the goal.   The ‘penalty box’ is generally considered the space from where goals can most easily be scored.   A foul commited  by the defending team in the box gives the attacking side a penalty kick,   hence the name penalty box.   The commentators used the  verbal shorthand “P K” to refer to penalty kicks.  I thought ‘Dead leg’ was a euphamism for someone useless.   I like to believe the commentator was suggesting these people were tired rather than useless.

stepped. Wayne Rooney just steps on him,   the referee did a good thing he saw the step then he took him off”   actually Wayne Rooney kicked him in the bollocks.   “when Rooney stepped on him that was a big no-no”.     These Amercan’s and their ‘polite’ euphamisms.   ‘Stepped‘   “big no-no“,   Hahaha.    

motivating. The commentators suggested that England’s (ugly?) performance was attributable to Sven Goran Eriksson  and the coaches  style.  ”I think the coach didn’t motivate the players” They suggested neither had adequate motivational discourses with the team.   I’m assuming they mean US style ‘motivational’ perhaps they think that Sven’s not sufficiently ‘super excited’.    

distraught. Beckham is in tears on the sideline” Taken off in the 53rd minute due to injury.   I cried at that point.   People do cry at football matches.   Audience and players,   after misfortune and GOALS.  I find it hard to think of the England team as lacking motivation when there are such clear physical displays of emotion and determination.     Sadness is quickly and effectively conveyed by subtle positioning of facial musccles.   Camera shots of England player’s faces after they lost the kick-off were strikingly different from earlier in the game.

UK based England fans.    ”79% of people in the UK watched England Ecuador match that’s amazing that’s the difference between English and American Football”   I like it when commentators throw in some statistics.   I wonder how they could possibly know that – how was the information gathered?     79%  is especially  impressive because the UK includes Scotland,   Wales and Northern Ireland.   The commentator didn’t mention this.   British people appear  to support which ever regional team is left playing. Scotland, Wales and Ireland teams have already been knocked out of  the 2006 World Cup.   An even higher proportion of English people outside of the UK probably watched the match.   All my English friends in the US did.   The dedication of the fan base is only ONE difference between American and English football.   Not THE difference.      

England fans in Germany. The commentators rarely commented on the fans in the ground.   Exceptions included comments at the end of extra time like “Nobody in the stadium has sat down for an hour“.    The English fan’s vocal and musical  presence was a very strong part of the whole experience right from the beginning of the match.   The commentators often had to ‘shout’ to be heard over the background noise of the England fans.     The fans sang

  • God save our gracious Queen….”   (Chorus of the British National Anthem)    
  • Eng-GER-land Eng-GER-land…
  • BOOOOOOOOOOOOOO”  
  • O-lay, Olay-Olay-Olay”
  • clapping (and horns)  :      clap-clap        clap-clap-clap       clap-clap-clap-CLAP       CLAP-CLAP

After England lost the game the relative quiet was striking.   The Portugeuse winning cheers were quieter than the England supporters’ encouraging chanting.

history. History is against England” the commentators’ discourse implies that because England has never won a penalty kick-off in the World cup they are hampered in some way.   Huh?   Whether someone-else did or didn’t score a goal in a different competition will impact whether this player does or doesn’t score a goal?   That’s just silly, silly  silly.    Scoring is completely attributable to the ability of the players (shooter and goalie) at the time they take the shot.  

previously  an umotivated  not pretty deadleg would streak into the box  and step on an airborne bench, that’s a no-no, giving the opposition a P.K.   History is against the bench”  

translates, in Wendy-English,  to

“previously, tired players have  raced into  the penalty box  and kicked jumping substitutes in the bollocks,  that’s a  foul,  giving the opposition a penalty kick and prompting disapproving ‘booo’s from the fans.  It  could happen again.  

4 bits of fabulous banter »

Portugal England (World Cup quarter final)

Saturday, July 1st, 2006 | tags: ,  |

Full time score:   Portugal 0 England 0

Overtime score:   Portugal 0 England 0

Penalty Kick-off

Portugal scored their first penalty.   England first penalty was saved.   That’s when I started crying.   Portugal’s second penalty saved.   England’s second  penalty scored,   and I stopped crying.   Portugal’s 3rd penalty saved,   England’s third penalty saved.   Portugal’s 4th penalty scored.    England’s forth penalty saved. Portugal’s 5th penalty scored….     game over.   Portugal  3 England 1       Much blubbing.     The Portugese goal keeper, Ricardo,  was named man of the match.   Clearly a good decision since the game was won on goal kicks and he saved 3/4 shots from England players.

The England squad was missing experienced, strong, forward players;    Playing most of the game with 10 rather than 11 players.    

  • Rooney off in the first half (red card).   We could do without bad tempered players taking the team one man down.    
  • Beckham off in the first half (injury),  
  • Owen so far off he never started the game because he’s back in the UK  (injury).    

The England players on the pitch  did an extremely good job,   just not outstanding enough to be worthy of a World Cup semi-final.  

what do you think of that »

malparit

Saturday, July 1st, 2006 | tags:  |

born badly (Catalan.   An insult)

provided translation note: Very used when people gets hungry whith others

(this post was bought to you by Eyan,   our Barcelonian correspondent.   I suspect Eyan saw through the provided translation note….)

what do you think of that »

choc-monella

Saturday, July 1st, 2006 | tags: ,  |

Oh my!

If England loose to Portugal tomorrow drowning my sorrows in a fabulous  Cadbury’s chocolate bar is not really an option.   Having a beer is also looking like a dodgy option.

What-ever the outcome we don’t face Argentinia.   Phew.   We had a nasty little ‘war’ with them over ‘the falklands’ in 1982,   lost our place in the 1986 World cup to them when Diego Maradona scored a goal with his HAND (illegal) and the goal was allowed.

what’s a girl supposed to do if we loose?    I’m just not prepared.   Condoms won’t work in this context.   We’ll have to win :-)

what do you think of that »