Aug 24 2008

padding

scribble tags:
Padding removed from swimsuit bras (flickr photoshare)

Padding removed from swimsuit bra's (flickr photoshare)

I reached my teens in the late 1970’s before the introduction of the ‘wonder-bra’.  Now,  bra’s without inbuilt padding, often called ‘push-up’ bras, are the smaller portion of the brazier market.  Luckily some designs do enable you to easily remove the default-provided padding and some celebrities are plucky enough to not-wear this generally unnecessary accessory and deal with the publicity that makes an issue out of their choice (e.g. Charlie Dimmock).

I can also verify that Jacksons stocks some fabulous bras without padding or underwiring,  Jacksons is a fashion rebel,  I love it!

one thought on “padding”

  1. thecultfigurine (published 9 comments) thinks:

    Wow, it’s a testament to your writing (as always) that I have a ton of possibly self-contradicting responses to your brief post. Thank you Wendy! In no order:

    - I agree that Ms. Dimmock’s underwear choices ought not to be news.

    - Yet, by discussing them, maybe women who would not have otherwise questioned the bra mandate can do so? Does she become, briefly, a role model? Is that a silver lining or am I just grasping at straws.

    - However I disagree with your characterization that bras are “generally unnecessary” - I think that depends a lot on your size and activity level. And a high-quality well-fitted bra, in my experience, feels shockingly good. An I-never-knew-it-could-be-like-this revelation. Sorry for oversharing ;-)

    - That said, I’ll add my belief that the bra mandate is not just about women’s physical comfort and support but also about men’s control over women’s bodies (surprise). I have been successfully socialized to feel more comfortable knowing my breasts are contained and won’t be swaying about, distracting other people. But I resent the notion that it’s my responsibility to prevent the distraction.

    - And the flip side of course, is the irony that brassiere design often *intends* to distract one’s breasts’ audience, just in a different socially-sanctioned way. Pushing ‘the girls’ up and together, etc, puts them on display in a different way from their default state. So really, it’s all about constructing the way we’re supposed to distract people. As usual, can’t win.

share your thoughts

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word